By George Scott
Project Director, Academic Equity Advocates
You will need to access the first link immediately below the opening paragraphs to access the pdf of Part 5 of this series. In Part 5, the
Nearing the end of 1998, the ultimate federal court decision regarding the Texas Education Agency’s student testing and accountability system was drawing ever closer. By the time that decision was actually made and in the year leading up to it, virtually every systemic, academically deceptive flaw in the system was becoming well-discovered by critics.
Be damned! The TEA’s top leadership offered strong defense of the integrity of the system. One defense came in a formal response to a brutal report on the TAAS testing program performed by the Dallas I.S.D. in late 1998The other defense came at a conference hosted by the National Academy of Science in Irvine, California in 1999.
The TAAS was meticulously credible as a result of rigorous standards. The TAAS was grade-level rigorous. Reality be damned. The defense could not step backwards with a federal court decision looming in January 2000.
PART 5: Empirical Reality & Trail of Deception Be Damned: Academic Integrity Defended
Here are some links to support documents from our External Reports page that are meaningful to this Part 4 presentation.
TEA Commissioner Assures Dallas I.S.D. of Academic Integrity and Grade-Level Rigor of TAAS
Transcript of TEA Representations of TAAS Rigorous Academic Integrity to NAS Conference